Home | Menu | Poem | Jokes | Games | Biography | Omss বাংলা | Celibrity Video | Dictionary

World Population Day

Biography of Nicolas Copernicus 1473 – 1543

Born Feb. 19, 1473, Toru, Pol.—died May 24, 1543, Frauenburg, East Prussia [now Frombork, Pol.]) Polish astronomer who proposed that the planets have the Sun as the fixed point to which their motions are to be referred; that the Earth is a planet which, besides orbiting the Sun annually, also turns once daily on its own axis; and that very slow, long-term changes in the direction of this axis account for the precession of the equinoxes. This representation of the heavens is usually called the heliocentric, or “Sun-centred,” system—derived from the Greek helios, meaning “Sun.” Copernicus's theory had important consequences for later thinkers of the scientific revolution, including such major figures as Galileo, Kepler, Descartes, and Newton. Copernicus probably hit upon his main idea sometime between 1508 and 1514, and during those years he wrote a manuscript usually called the Commentariolus (“Little Commentary”). However, the book that contains the final version of his theory, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium libri vi (“Six Books Concerning the Revolutions of the Heavenly Orbs”), did not appear in print until 1543, the year of his death.

Early life and education

Certain facts about Copernicus's early life are well established, although a biography written by his ardent disciple Georg Joachim Rheticus (1514–74) is unfortunately lost. According to a later horoscope, Nicolaus Copernicus was born on February 19, 1473, in Toru, a city in north-central Poland on the Vistula River south of the major Baltic seaport of Gdask. His father, Nicolaus, was a well-to-do merchant, and his mother, Barbara Watzenrode, also came from a leading merchant family. Nicolaus was the youngest of four children. After his father's death, sometime between 1483 and 1485, his mother's brother Lucas Watzenrode (1447–1512) took his nephew under his protection. Watzenrode, soon to be bishop of the chapter of Varmia (Warmia), saw to young Nicolaus's education and his future career as a church canon.

Between 1491 and about 1494 Copernicus studied liberal arts—including astronomy and astrology—at the University of Cracow (Kraków). Like many students of his time, however, he left before completing his degree, resuming his studies in Italy at the University of Bologna, where his uncle had obtained a doctorate in canon law in 1473. The Bologna period (1496–1500) was short but significant. For a time Copernicus lived in the same house as the principal astronomer at the university, Domenico Maria de Novara (Latin: Domenicus Maria Novaria Ferrariensis; 1454–1504). Novara had the responsibility of issuing annual astrological prognostications for the city, forecasts that included all social groups but gave special attention to the fate of the Italian princes and their enemies. Copernicus, as is known from Rheticus, was “assistant and witness” to some of Novara's observations, and his involvement with the production of the annual forecasts means that he was intimately familiar with the practice of astrology. Novara also probably introduced Copernicus to two important books that framed his future problematic as a student of the heavens: Epitoma in Almagestum Ptolemaei (“Epitome of Ptolemy's Almagest”) by Johann Müller (also known as Regiomontanus, 1436–76) and Disputationes adversus astrologianm divinatricenm (“Disputations against Divinatory Astrology”) by Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463–94). The first provided a summary of the foundations of Ptolemy's astronomy, with Regiomontanus's corrections and critical expansions of certain important planetary models that might have been suggestive to Copernicus of directions leading to the heliocentric hypothesis. Pico's Disputationes offered a devastating skeptical attack on the foundations of astrology that reverberated into the 17th century. Among Pico's criticisms was the charge that, because astronomers disagreed about the order of the planets, astrologers could not be certain about the strengths of the powers issuing from the planets.

Only 27 recorded observations are known for Copernicus's entire life (he undoubtedly made more than that), most of them concerning eclipses, alignments, and conjunctions of planets and stars. The first such known observation occurred on March 9, 1497, at Bologna. In De revolutionibus, book 4, chapter 27, Copernicus reported that he had seen the Moon eclipse “the brightest star in the eye of the Bull,” Alpha Tauri (Aldebaran). By the time he published this observation in 1543, he had made it the basis of a theoretical claim: that it confirmed exactly the size of the apparent lunar diameter. But in 1497 he was probably using it to assist in checking the new- and full-moon tables derived from the commonly used Alfonsine Tables and employed in Novara's forecast for the year 1498.

In 1500 Copernicus spoke before an interested audience in Rome on mathematical subjects, but the exact content of his lectures is unknown. In 1501 he stayed briefly in Frauenburg but soon returned to Italy to continue his studies, this time at the University of Padua, where he pursued medical studies between 1501 and 1503. At this time medicine was closely allied with astrology, as the stars were thought to influence the body's dispositions. Thus, Copernicus's astrological experience at Bologna was better training for medicine than one might imagine today. Copernicus later painted a self-portrait; it is likely that he acquired the necessary artistic skills while in Padua, since there was a flourishing community of painters there and in nearby Venice. In May 1503 Copernicus finally received a doctorate—like his uncle, in canon law—but from an Italian university where he had not studied: the University of Ferrara. When he returned to Poland, Bishop Watzenrode arranged a sinecure for him: an in absentia teaching post, or scholastry, at Wrocaw. Copernicus's actual duties at the bishopric palace, however, were largely administrative and medical. As a church canon, he collected rents from church-owned lands; secured military defenses; oversaw chapter finances; managed the bakery, brewery, and mills; and cared for the medical needs of the other canons and his uncle. Copernicus's astronomical work took place in his spare time, apart from these other obligations. He used the knowledge of Greek that he had acquired during his Italian studies to prepare a Latin translation of the aphorisms of an obscure 7th-century Byzantine historian and poet, Theophylactus Simocattes. The work was published in Cracow in 1509 and dedicated to his uncle. It was during the last years of Watzenrode's life that Copernicus evidently came up with the idea on which his subsequent fame was to rest.

Copernicus's reputation outside local Polish circles as an astronomer of considerable ability is evident from the fact that in 1514 he was invited to offer his opinion at the church's Fifth Lateran Council on the critical problem of the reform of the calendar. The civil calendar then in use was still the one produced under the reign of Julius Caesar, and, over the centuries, it had fallen seriously out of alignment with the actual positions of the Sun. This rendered the dates of crucial feast days, such as Easter, highly problematic. Whether Copernicus ever offered any views on how to reform the calendar is not known; in any event, he never attended any of the council's sessions. The leading calendar reformer was Paul of Middelburg, bishop of Fossombrone. When Copernicus composed his dedication to De revolutionibus in 1542, he remarked that “mathematics is written for mathematicians.” Here he distinguished between those, like Paul, whose mathematical abilities were good enough to understand his work and others who had no such ability and for whom his work was not intended.


Copernicus's astronomical work

The contested state of planetary theory in the late 15th century and Pico's attack on astrology's foundations together constitute the principal historical considerations in constructing the background to Copernicus's achievement. In Copernicus's period, astrology and astronomy were considered subdivisions of a common subject called the “science of the stars,” whose main aim was to provide a description of the arrangement of the heavens as well as the theoretical tools and tables of motions that would permit accurate construction of horoscopes and annual prognostications. At this time the terms astrologer, astronomer, and mathematician were virtually interchangeable; they generally denoted anyone who studied the heavens using mathematical techniques. Pico claimed that astrology ought to be condemned because its practitioners were in disagreement about everything, from the divisions of the zodiac to the minutest observations to the order of the planets. A second long-standing disagreement, not mentioned by Pico, concerned the status of the planetary models. From antiquity, astronomical modeling was governed by the premise that the planets move with uniform angular motion on fixed radii at a constant distance from their centres of motion. Two types of models derived from this premise. The first, represented by that of Aristotle, held that the planets are carried around the centre of the universe embedded in unchangeable, material, invisible spheres at fixed distances. Since all planets have the same centre of motion, the universe is made of nested, concentric spheres with no gaps between them. As a predictive model, this account was of limited value. Among other things, it had the distinct disadvantage that it could not account for variations in the apparent brightness of the planets since the distances from the centre were always the same. A second tradition, deriving from Claudius Ptolemy, solved this problem by postulating three mechanisms: uniformly revolving, off-centre circles called eccentrics; epicycles, little circles whose centres moved uniformly on the circumference of circles of larger radius (deferents); and equants. The equant, however, broke with the main assumption of ancient astronomy because it separated the condition of uniform motion from that of constant distance from the centre. A planet viewed from the centre c of its orbit would appear to move sometimes faster, sometimes slower. As seen from the Earth, removed a distance e from c, the planet would also appear to move nonuniformly. Only from the equant, an imaginary point at distance 2 e from the Earth, would the planet appear to move uniformly. A planet-bearing sphere revolving around an equant point will wobble; situate one sphere within another, and the two will collide, disrupting the heavenly order. In the 13th century a group of Persian astronomers at Margheh discovered that, by combining two uniformly revolving epicycles to generate an oscillating point that would account for variations in distance, they could devise a model that produced the equalized motion without referring to an equant point.

The Margheh work was written in Arabic, which Copernicus did not read. However, he learned to do the Margheh “trick,” either independently or through a still-unknown intermediary link. This insight was the starting point for his attempt to resolve the conflict raised by wobbling physical spheres. Copernicus might have continued this work by considering each planet independently, as did Ptolemy in the Almagest, without any attempt to bring all the models together into a coordinated arrangement. However, he was also disturbed by Pico's charge that astronomers could not agree on the actual order of the planets. The difficulty focused on the locations of Venus and Mercury. There was general agreement that the Moon and Sun encircled the motionless Earth and that Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn were situated beyond the Sun in that order. However, Ptolemy placed Venus closest to the Sun and Mercury to the Moon, while others claimed that Mercury and Venus were beyond the Sun.

In the Commentariolus, Copernicus postulated that, if the Sun is assumed to be at rest and if the Earth is assumed to be in motion, then the remaining planets fall into an orderly relationship whereby their sidereal periods increase from the Sun as follows: Mercury (88 days), Venus (225 days), Earth (1 year), Mars (1.9 years), Jupiter (12 years), and Saturn (30 years). This theory did resolve the disagreement about the ordering of the planets but, in turn, raised new problems. To accept the theory's premises, one had to abandon much of Aristotelian natural philosophy and develop a new explanation for why heavy bodies fall to a moving Earth. It was also necessary to explain how a transient body like the Earth, filled with meteorological phenomena, pestilence, and wars, could be part of a perfect and imperishable heaven. In addition, Copernicus was working with many observations that he had inherited from antiquity and whose trustworthiness he could not verify. In constructing a theory for the precession of the equinoxes, for example, he was trying to build a model based upon very small, long-term effects. And his theory for Mercury was left with serious incoherencies.

Any of these considerations alone could account for Copernicus's delay in publishing his work. (He remarked in the preface to De revolutionibus that he had chosen to withhold publication not for merely the nine years recommended by the Roman poet Horace but for 36 years, four times that period.) And, when a description of the main elements of the heliocentric hypothesis was first published, in the Narratio prima (1540 and 1541, “First Narration”), it was not under Copernicus's own name but under that of the 25-year-old Georg Rheticus. Rheticus, a Lutheran from the University of Wittenberg, Germany, stayed with Copernicus at Frauenburg for about two and a half years, between 1539 and 1542. The Narratio prima was, in effect, a joint production of Copernicus and Rheticus, something of a “trial balloon” for the main work. It provided a summary of the theoretical principles contained in the manuscript of De revolutionibus, emphasized their value for computing new planetary tables, and presented Copernicus as following admiringly in the footsteps of Ptolemy even as he broke fundamentally with his ancient predecessor. It also provided what was missing from the Commentariolus: a basis for accepting the claims of the new theory.

Both Rheticus and Copernicus knew that they could not definitively rule out all possible alternatives to the heliocentric theory. But they could underline what Copernicus's theory provided that others could not: a singular method for ordering the planets and for calculating the relative distances of the planets from the Sun. Rheticus compared this new universe to a well-tuned musical instrument and to the interlocking wheel-mechanisms of a clock. In the preface to De revolutionibus, Copernicus used an image from Horace's Ars poetica (“Art of Poetry”). The theories of his predecessors, he wrote, were like a human figure in which the arms, legs, and head were put together in the form of a disorderly monster. His own representation of the universe, in contrast, was an orderly whole in which a displacement of any part would result in a disruption of the whole. In effect, a new criterion of scientific adequacy was advanced together with the new theory of the universe.

Publication of De revolutionibus

The presentation of Copernicus's theory in its final form is inseparable from the conflicted history of its publication. When Rheticus left Frauenburg to return to his teaching duties at Wittenberg, he took the manuscript with him in order to arrange for its publication at Nürnberg, the leading centre of printing in Germany. He chose the top printer in the city, Johann Petreius, who had published a number of ancient and modern astrological works during the 1530s. It was not uncommon for authors to participate directly in the printing of their manuscripts, sometimes even living in the printer's home. However, Rheticus was unable to remain and supervise. He turned the manuscript over to Andreas Osiander (1498–1552), a theologian experienced in shepherding mathematical books through production as well as a leading political figure in the city and an ardent follower of Luther (although he was eventually expelled from the Lutheran church). In earlier communication with Copernicus, Osiander had urged him to present his ideas as purely hypothetical, and he now introduced certain changes without the permission of either Rheticus or Copernicus. Osiander added an unsigned “letter to the reader” directly after the title page, which maintained that the hypotheses contained within made no pretense to truth and that, in any case, astronomy was incapable of finding the causes of heavenly phenomena. A casual reader would be confused about the relationship between this letter and the book's contents. Both Petreius and Rheticus, having trusted Osiander, now found themselves double-crossed. Rheticus's rage was so great that he crossed out the letter with a great red X in the copies sent to him. However, the city council of Nürnberg refused to punish Petreius, and no public revelation of Osiander's role was made until Kepler revealed it in his Astronomia Nova ( New Astronomy) in 1609. In addition, the title of the work was changed from the manuscript's “On the Revolutions of the Orbs of the World” to “Six Books Concerning the Revolutions of the Heavenly Orbs”—a change that appeared to mitigate the book's claim to describe the real universe.

Many of the details of these local publication struggles enjoyed an underground history among 16th-century astronomers long before Kepler published Osiander's identity. Ironically, Osiander's “letter” made it possible for the book to be read as a new method of calculation, rather than a work of natural philosophy, and in so doing may even have aided in its initially positive reception. It was not until Kepler that Copernicus's cluster of predictive mechanisms would be fully transformed into a new philosophy about the fundamental structure of the universe.

Legend has it that a copy of De revolutionibus was placed in Copernicus's hands a few days after he lost consciousness from a stroke. He awoke long enough to realize that he was holding his great book and then expired, publishing as he perished. The legend has some credibility, although it also has the beatific air of a saint's life.

33 comments:

Anonymous said...

I relish, cause I discovered just what I was looking for.
You have ended my four day lengthy hunt! God Bless you man.

Have a nice day. Bye
Also see my web page - http://hoidtreatment.webs.com/apps/blog/show/13931846-what-exactly-is-provillus-

Anonymous said...

Hi there just wanted to give you a quick heads up.
The text in your post seem to be running off the screen in Internet explorer.

I'm not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with web browser compatibility but I thought I'd post to
let you know. The style and design look great though! Hope you get the problem fixed soon.
Cheers
Feel free to surf my page - http://www.zimbio.com/Hair+Loss/articles/TtAltOo8r1Q/Simple+Facts+Provillus

Anonymous said...

A person essentially lend a hand to make severely articles I might state.
This is the very first time I frequented your website
page and so far? I surprised with the analysis you made to make this actual
put up extraordinary. Wonderful process!
My web site : Jeramy

Anonymous said...

I'm curious to find out what blog system you are using? I'm experiencing some small
security problems with my latest site and I would like to find something more
safeguarded. Do you have any suggestions?
Here is my page :: http://provillusofficial.blog.com/2012/09/14/provillus/

Anonymous said...

You can certainly see your skills within the work you write.
The arena hopes for even more passionate writers like you who aren't afraid to say how they believe. Always go after your heart.
Here is my homepage ... http://hoidtreatment.webs.com/apps/blog/show/13931433-combating-hair-loss-with-provillus

Anonymous said...

What's up, I read your new stuff daily. Your humoristic style is witty, keep it up!
Also visit my web site - Provillus

Anonymous said...

Link exchange is nothing else but it is only placing
the other person's website link on your page at appropriate place and other person will also do same in favor of you.
Feel free to visit my blog post ... http://goarticles.com/article/Is-Hair-Loss-Inevitable-What-About-Profollica/6048433/

Anonymous said...

You really make it appear really easy together with your presentation but I in finding this
matter to be really something which I feel I would never understand.

It sort of feels too complex and extremely large for
me. I'm looking forward on your next post, I'll attempt to get
the hang of it!
Take a look at my web-site ... provillus Ingredients men

Anonymous said...

It's very straightforward to find out any topic on net as compared to textbooks, as I found this article at this web site.
Look at my web site http://lucila13.wetpaint.com/page/Provillus

Anonymous said...

My brother recommended I would possibly like this web
site. He was once entirely right. This submit actually made my
day. You cann't imagine simply how so much time I had spent for this information! Thanks!
Also visit my website Candelaria

Anonymous said...

Do you have any video of that? I'd like to find out more details.
Take a look at my web blog :: http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474981707495

Anonymous said...

A motivating discussion is worth comment. I do think that you ought to
publish more about this topic, it may not be a taboo subject but
typically people don't speak about such issues. To the next! All the best!!
Also visit my web page :: hoidtreatment.webs.com

Anonymous said...

Magnificent web site. A lot of useful information here.

I'm sending it to some buddies ans additionally sharing in delicious. And obviously, thank you to your effort!
My web page :: H Miracle

Anonymous said...

My spouse and I stumbled over here different web page and
thought I may as well check things out. I like what
I see so i am just following you. Look forward to looking at your web page yet
again.
Look at my site ; http://hemorrhoidtreatmentreviews.webs.com/apps/blog/show/19528370-how-the-provillus-ingredients-help-fight-hair-loss-

Anonymous said...

Awesome post.
Here is my blog :: Sheena

Anonymous said...

You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be actually something which I think I
would never understand. It seems too complicated and
very broad for me. I am looking forward for your next post, I'll try to get the hang of it!
My web blog :: http://hemorrhoidtreatmentreviews.webs.com/apps/blog/show/3388226-zenmed-ziro-review-for-easing-hemorrhoids

Anonymous said...

Wow! In the end I got a webpage from where I can genuinely obtain valuable data concerning my study and knowledge.
Feel free to surf my blog : provillus receding hairline

Anonymous said...

We absolutely love your blog and find nearly all of your post's to be just what I'm looking for.

Does one offer guest writers to write content for yourself?
I wouldn't mind publishing a post or elaborating on most of the subjects you write concerning here. Again, awesome web log!
Feel free to visit my blog http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474981720911

Anonymous said...

This is very interesting, You are a very skilled blogger.
I've joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your fantastic post. Also, I've shared your website
in my social networks!
Also visit my blog - Katia

Anonymous said...

I do agree with all the ideas you have introduced on your post.
They're very convincing and can certainly work. Still, the posts are too brief for beginners. May you please lengthen them a bit from next time? Thanks for the post.
Feel free to surf my homepage : Sima

Anonymous said...

Superb post but I was wanting to know if you could write
a litte more on this subject? I'd be very grateful if you could elaborate a little bit more. Thanks!
Look into my homepage http://jacquesschneider.webs.com/apps/blog/show/20963783-defining-fashion-of-chi-camo-flat-irons

Anonymous said...

Superb, what a weblog it is! This blog gives valuable
information to us, keep it up.
Check out my homepage http://lucila13.wetpaint.com/page/Procerin+Review+-+One+Excellent+Way+to+Stop+Hair+Loss

Anonymous said...

Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it
seems as though you relied on the video to make your point.
You definitely know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to
your site when you could be giving us something enlightening to
read?
Take a look at my blog hoidtreatment.webs.com

Anonymous said...

I'm not sure exactly why but this website is loading extremely slow for me. Is anyone else having this problem or is it a issue on my end? I'll
check back later on and see if the problem still exists.
Here is my blog : http://blogtext.org/jamenolan/article/1172058.html

Anonymous said...

I hardly comment, but i did some searching and wound up here "Biography of Nicolas Copernicus 1473 - 1543".
And I actually do have a few questions for you if you tend
not to mind. Is it just me or does it seem
like some of these responses look as if they are left by brain dead visitors?
:-P And, if you are writing at additional sites, I'd like to follow everything fresh you have to post. Could you list of every one of all your shared pages like your linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter feed?
Here is my blog post :: http://refrigeratorwaterfilters.webs.com/apps/blog/show/20856358-frigidaire-refrigerator-water-filters-finding-the-best-ones

Anonymous said...

Very good blog you have here but I was wanting to know if you knew of any discussion
boards that cover the same topics discussed here?
I'd really love to be a part of community where I can get advice from other experienced individuals that share the same interest. If you have any suggestions, please let me know. Many thanks!
Also visit my weblog - Provillus Dht

Anonymous said...

Thanks for finally talking about > "Biography of Nicolas Copernicus 1473 - 1543" < Loved it!
Here is my site - http://jacquesschneide.blog.com/2010/04/18/procerin/

Anonymous said...

Hmm it seems like your blog ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I
guess I'll just sum it up what I submitted and say, I'm thoroughly enjoying your blog.
I too am an aspiring blog writer but I'm still new to the whole thing. Do you have any points for first-time blog writers? I'd genuinely appreciate it.
My blog post :: http://coloncleanserreviews.typepad.com/colon-cleanse/2012/09/look-at-what-im-eating-today-avocado-and-pistachio-nuts.html

Anonymous said...

Hi! This post could not be written any better! Reading through this post reminds me of
my good old room mate! He always kept chatting about this.
I will forward this post to him. Fairly certain he will have a good read.
Thank you for sharing!
Here is my webpage :: Cameron

Anonymous said...

Having read this I believed it was really informative.
I appreciate you finding the time and effort to put this short article together.
I once again find myself spending a significant amount of
time both reading and posting comments. But so what,
it was still worthwhile!
Look into my webpage ; natural hair loss treatments

Anonymous said...

Everything is very open with a clear explanation
of the challenges. It was truly informative. Your website is extremely helpful.
Thank you for sharing!
Feel free to visit my web blog : http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/natural-hair-loss-treatments-and-product-reviews-explained-in-great-detail-at-hairlosshavencom-147600.htm

Anonymous said...

It's very simple to find out any matter on net as compared to textbooks, as I found this paragraph at this web site.
Also visit my site :: http://briggshemorrhoids.blog.com/2012/10/23/provillus-liquid-and-minoxidil/

Anonymous said...

Hi my family member! I wish to say that this article is awesome,
great written and come with approximately all vital infos.
I'd like to look more posts like this .
My site :: Hollis